Tuesday, 5 April 2011

PM Lee Hsien Loong says "Two-party system 'not feasible'"


http://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20110406-271953.html

By Kenny Chee
Having a two-party system of politics is not feasible because there is not enough talent to form two first-class teams to govern Singapore well, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last night.
"The most effective way to get a two-party system is to split the People's Action Party (PAP) in two because the talent is there," he said.
Speaking at a forum on leadership renewal at the University Cultural Centre, Mr Lee said the party had "seriously considered" splitting itself in two but did not go ahead because it could not form two teams that are each as good as the combined team.
Therefore, Mr Lee said that it is best to have one strong team with the best people.
If the PAP split into two, he said the Government would become weaker and the chances of thing going wrong would increase, or standard of governance would drop.
Mr Lee cited how two-party systems could also arise if society splits along the lines of race and religion, or along class lines such as with Britain and the United States.
He said the first scenario was the "worst possible" for Singapore and the second was "not a good outcome".
A two-party system could also arise from two groups pushing different policies, but Mr Lee sad this is unlikely as the PAP is pragmatic and open to all good ideas.


While I would agree that two-party system is not feasible for Singapore, but I also believe that a one-party system is obsolete in the 21st century.  So what do we do?

Beyond a one party and two party system, there is also something known as a multi-party system.  This system ensures that no single party dominates the government.  Such a system is common in small democracies similar in population size to Singapore such as Finland and Sweden and has proved to work as evidenced by the successful economies of Finland and Sweden.

Lee Hsien Loong has already admited that it is difficult to attract young people into the government.  The PAP is experiencing a confidence and morale crisis which will certainly result in a greatly weakened government in the future.  In theory and in the past, the one-party system is the best solution for Singapore, but this is no longer the case in today's world.


 Summary of the 18 March 2007 Parliament of Finland election results
Parties Votes % Seats
Centre Party (Suomen Keskusta, Centern i Finland) 640,428 23.1 51
National Coalition Party (Kansallinen Kokoomus, Samlingspartiet) 616,841 22.3 50
Social Democratic Party of Finland (Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue, Finlands socialdemokratiska parti) 594,194 21.4 45
Left Alliance (Vasemmistoliitto, Vänsterförbundet) 244,296 8.8 17
Green League (Vihreä liitto, Gröna förbundet) 234,429 8.5 15
Christian Democrats (Kristillisdemokraatit, Kristdemokraterna) 134,790 4.9 7
Swedish People's Party (Svenska Folkpartiet, Ruotsalainen kansanpuolue) 126,520 4.5 9
True Finns (Perussuomalaiset, Sannfinländarna) 112,256 4.1 5
Communist Party of Finland (Suomen Kommunistinen Puolue, Finlands kommunistiska parti) 18,277 0.7 0
Seniors' Party of Finland (Suomen Senioripuolue, Finlands Seniorparti) 16,715 0.6 0
Bourgeois Alliance (Borgerlig Allians, Åland) 9,561 0.3 1


Summary of the 19 September 2010 Parliament of Sweden election results
Parties and coalitions Votes Permanent seats Adjustment seats Total seats seats %/votes %
# ± % ±% # ± # ± seats swing
Swedish Social Democratic Party
Socialdemokraterna
1,827,497 decrease115,128 30.66 decrease4.33 112 decrease18 0 steady 0 112 decrease18 1.05
Moderate Party
Moderaterna
1,791,766 increase335,752 30.06 increase3.83 107 increase10 0 steady 0 107 increase10 1.02
Green Party
Miljöpartiet de Gröna
437,435 increase146,314 7.34 increase2.09 19 increase10 6 decrease4 25 increase6 0.98
Liberal People's Party
Folkpartiet liberalerna
420,524 decrease2,129 7.06 decrease0.48 17 decrease5 7 increase1 24 decrease4 0.97
Centre Party
Centerpartiet
390,804 decrease46,585 6.56 decrease1.32 21 decrease6 2 steady 0 23 decrease6 1.01
Sweden Democrats
Sverigedemokraterna
339,610 increase177,147 5.70 increase2.77 14 increase14 6 increase6 20 increase20 1.01
Left Party
Vänsterpartiet
334,053 increase9,331 5.60 decrease0.24 9 decrease4 10 increase1 19 decrease3 0.97
Christian Democrats
Kristdemokraterna
333,696 decrease32,302 5.60 decrease0.99 11 decrease6 8 increase1 19 decrease5 0.97

Pirate Party
Piratpartiet
38,491 increase3,573 0.65 increase0.02 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Feminist Initiative
Feministiskt initiativ
24,139 decrease13,815 0.40 decrease0.28 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Swedish Senior Citizen Interest Party
Sveriges pensionärers intresseparti
11,078 decrease17,728 0.19 decrease0.33 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Rural Democrats
Landsbygdsdemokraterna
1,565 increase1,565 0.03 increase0.03 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Socialist Justice Party
Rättvisepartiet Socialisterna
1,507 increase410 0.03 increase0.01 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Norrland Coalition Party
Norrländska Samlingspartiet
1,456 increase1,456 0.02 increase0.02 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
National Democrats
Nationaldemokraterna
1,141 decrease1,923 0.02 decrease0.04 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Classical Liberal Party
Klassiskt Liberala Partiet
716 increase514 0.01 increase0.01 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Freedom Party
Frihetspartiet
688 increase688 0.01 increase0.01 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Party of the Swedes
Svenskarnas Parti
681 increase681 0.01 increase0.01 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Unity
Enhet
632 decrease2,016 0.01 decrease0.04 0 - 0 - 0 - 0.00
Parties with less than 500 votes 2,929 decrease1,837 0.05 decrease0.03 - - - - - - 0.00
The Alliance
Alliansen
(Moderate Party, Liberal People's Party,
Centre Party, Christian Democrats)
2,936,790 increase258,994 49.27 increase1.03 156 decrease3 17 decrease2 173 decrease5 1.01
Red-Greens
Rödgröna
(Social Democrats, Green Party, Left Party)
2,598,985 increase40,517 43.60 decrease2.48 140 decrease11 16 decrease4 156 decrease15 1.03

1 comment:

  1. Further to my commentary on the 5 April 2011, many PAP MPs and ministers (Lim Boon Heng, Abdullah Tarmugi, Jayakuma have "resigned" - signaled their intention not to contest in the coming election.

    ReplyDelete